Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Ethos, Pathos, Logos

In the speech given by Frannie Lou Hamer, there is a great representation of ethos, pathos, and logos. As she very firmly stated her exact address and various dates, she gave statistics and showed the audience that she had observed everything she had claimed to observe. In this way she is also showing her ethos because she allows the audience and all members of the Credentials Committee to trust her as she speaks. She is very upfront with the people she is speaking in front of. She brings out pathos for much of the speech. She vividly explains the way she and her friends were treated in restaurants, bathrooms, jail, and many other places. These descriptions causes the audience to react in a more sensitive manner. In the speech given by Stokely Camichael, once again we can see ethos, pathos, and logos being used. He shows his ethos by informing the audience that he has done several things with very well known groups and people such as Martin Luther King Jr. and the Students Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. This allows the audience to believe the things he says knowing that he is being truthful. He uses pathos in a very different way than many speakers. He uses jokes as an attempt to draw his audience of college student's attention to what he is saying. The laughter from the crowd shows that this appeal to emotion benefits his speech. He appealed to logos by giving clear examples of the things that occurred as well as when and where they happened.

6 comments:

Alex Ray said...

The giving of her address was an interesting beginning. Descriptions of past experiences also evoke emotions from people wanting change.

WT said...

I actually liked both of their speeches and believe that both made exellent points in terms of what segregation does. I completely agree with what you said about both giving vivid details about who they are, who they worked for, and the things that happened to them.

P.No said...

Most people are picking up on the fact that her introduction is key, and its cool to see that we are all recognizing these important trends. Hamer did it, and so did Carmichael. Charmichael uses a slightly different approach because he aligns himself with the great Martin Luther King, which puts him in a circle of trust so great that audiences are definitely going to give him trust.

cbialick said...

I agree the point you brought up about Hammer using a substantial amount of ethos. Through giving out her exact living address to her upfront symbol style of speaking, she gained a lot of credibility from her audience.

dkernan said...

I think it is important that you mentioned the aspect of laughter in the Carmichael speech and the conclusions you can draw from its presence. I agree that the humor he includes helps maintain the attention of his audience at the university.

Dan-the-Man said...

claiming to have worked with MLK would probably be enough ethos for me to follow them off a bridge lol